Cedar Boschan in the Wall Street Journal

I commented in The Wall Street Journal on accounting messes and other blowback when employees at Meta and other companies 'slice the salami' of employer perks.

The court of public opinion is divided.

Read the article by Callum Borchers here: https://www.wsj.com/lifestyle/careers/the-little-sins-we-commit-at-workand-the-bosses-who-are-cracking-down-74929770?st

Food & Beverage Litigator? Four Damages Claims that are Trending

1. Sustainability and Environmental Claims: A New Frontier for Litigation in Food & Beverage

As sustainability becomes central to brand identity, food and beverage companies are increasingly promoting green initiatives and eco-friendly practices. However, claims about environmental impact, such as recyclability, carbon neutrality, or zero waste, are now under the microscope. False or exaggerated environmental claims, known as "greenwashing," could lead to substantial damages.

Litigation on this front often involves claims about the recyclability or biodegradability of packaging, which in reality may not be feasible in many regions due to limited recycling capabilities. The stakes are high as brands can face class actions if consumers feel misled about a product’s ecological footprint. Expect heightened scrutiny of sustainability marketing, particularly in states with strong environmental protection laws like California.

2. All-Natural and Health Claims: A Growing Challenge for Compliance

"All-natural" and "organic" have become popular selling points, but with consumers paying more attention to labels, these claims carry greater risk. Many cases have focused on whether products labeled "natural" contain synthetic ingredients or additives that might be considered misleading. Litigation on health-oriented labels is expected to surge, as ambiguous or loosely regulated terms like "all-natural" can lead to lawsuits if the product does not meet consumer expectations.

Attorneys specializing in food litigation should prepare for more disputes over product labeling, especially as brands introduce novel ingredients or formulations that might conflict with these health-focused claims. Companies must be cautious in their language or risk significant damages for failing to meet consumers' understanding of "natural" or "organic."

3. Deceptive Pricing: An Overlooked Risk for Premium Brands

In the competitive food and beverage market, brands often use discounts to attract customers. However, FTC guidelines specify that discounted prices must follow a period where products were genuinely offered at the regular price, a practice not consistently followed. Brands that advertise perpetual discounts without honoring regular pricing could face deceptive pricing lawsuits, especially in the premium product space.

Litigation attorneys should keep an eye on this area as regulatory bodies intensify enforcement. Such cases carry financial penalties and reputational risks, particularly as consumers become more aware of and sensitive to pricing transparency.

4. Charitable and ESG Claims: Brand Responsibility

Brands have increasingly incorporated charitable commitments and ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) promises into their marketing. However, claims about social responsibility or contributions to sustainability projects could backfire if deemed exaggerated or misleading. Cases focused on these representations—whether made on a website, social media, or product packaging—could generate major damages claims.

For instance, if a brand claims a portion of sales is donated to a specific cause, yet the contribution is minimal or misrepresented, this can lead to legal action. Lawyers should advise clients to align closely with their ESG messaging to avoid potential misrepresentation claims in the coming years.

Conclusion

At my damages consulting firm, Boschan Corp., we help attorneys analyze the complexities and potential defenses for your clients' unique matters. To explore whether we can strengthen your clients’ claims or defense with our thorough, defensible damages analysis, start with a conflict check by calling me at (424) 248-8866.